Archive for Lean
If Nothing Bad Happens, You Must Be Doing Something Right?
Posted by: | CommentsYou have been struggling for a while and now the recession is really hitting hard. You are starting to wonder… Where have my customers gone? Are my competitors just buying jobs? How can I cut expenses? It seems like a lot of people standing around? How did I get here? That is precisely how a mental model could work and it may be a result of if nothing bad happened, you must be doing something right. So as time moved on, bad practices became part of our business model. ![]()
Despite signs of trouble, we adjust our mental models to accommodate larger deviations from the norm. Without a mechanism for reframing our behavior or redefining our group, the effects are ignored, as they were at NASA, until a catastrophe happens.
As the investigating board put it, both Columbia and Challenger were lost also because of the failure of NASA’s organizational system: both actions were failures of foresight in which history played a prominent role.
So influential board NASA’s models and scripts, and so delusional self-confidence bred group is, that even after Columbia broke up, killing all on board, the space program manager told the press that he was comfortable with his previous assessments of risk and didn’t think the foam debris could cause the accident. But remember that a key feature of this system is that, taken one small step at a time, each decision always seems correct.
In a culture that evolved at NASA, each returned from a successful mission was another moon landing. NASA was silly. Applause that was by the time of Columbia, more than 30 years old. So instead of appearing more deeply into the problem, they gradually revised their models until they were literally interpreting failure as success. The final report of the commission said:
Engineers and managers incorporated worsening anomalies into the engineering experience base, which functioned as an elastic waistband, expanding the hold larger deviations from the original design. Anomalies that did not lead to catastrophic failures were treated as a source of valid engineering data to justify further flights.
This example is taken from a Laurence Gonzales book Everyday Survival: Why Smart People Do Stupid Things and should make it obvious why you must not only have a systematic process in place for continuous improvement but also outside eyes observing your practices mindful not to leave your organization slip into doing; STUPID THINGS!
Rant: So many times our acceptance of our culture allows us to get sloppy in our practices. Good enough is a common word. When I discuss Lean in marketing it is typically met with resistance. When I use the words Six Sigma Marketing; alarms, bells, whistles and even fireworks seem to take place as a result of the connotation of “Six Sigma”. I seldom ever get understanding that you should look at Six Sigma as a methodology rather than the strict mathematical definition of Six Sigma. It is the mental model that is in place.
Having a systematic process in place allows us to deal more effectively with the problems and even the future. Our choices of how we do things and what we see (data) have significantly multiplied. Decisions have become increasingly more difficult. Having a proven process such as the Six Sigma tool of DMAIC will result in better informed and more accurate decisions. I use Six Sigma as an example. There are many methodologies and tools out there to solve problems. However, even these processes can become “intuitionalized” and allow good enough to creep in. Keep striving for perfection and always keep asking Why!
Related Posts:
Bootstrapping business Survival
Businesses that Die, Die of confusion
Could a CMO increase their tenure by using Six Sigma?
Overcoming Resistance and Backsliding
Transforming Healthcare thru Lean
Use Intuition or Six Sigma for your Marketing Data?
Can you Master Continuous Improvement?
Overcoming Resistance and Backsliding
Posted by: | CommentsIn this blog post Story of Going Lean in Healthcare: On the Mend and in a recent podcast, Transforming Healthcare thru Lean. I was introduced to the 5 Stages of Change outlined by one of the co-authors, John Toussaint, MD. Recently, when I was reading the book Mastery: The Keys to Success and Long-Term Fulfillment and most specifically the chapter, Why Resolutions Fail. The reluctance or resistance to change were further enforced and I found myself thinking of the 5 Stage outline.
When you start a continuous improvement process such a Lean or Six Sigma many times you will get that initial surge and after some additional hard work , you might feel that you have developed a good process for continuous improvement. You’re happy and the employees are happy and things could not be better! Then it stops, why?
Our basic instinct is that we have a tendency to keep things as they are even if they aren’t very good. We resist all change. If you have been doing something for 20 years one way, a 60 day improvement is minuscule in comparison. I was always taught when training bird dogs that once a habit is created it takes at least twice as long to break it. There are exceptions if a traumatic or an extraordinary circumstance takes place but for the most part it takes time.
So if a organizational culture change occurs large resistance, it may be because it is a really terrible idea or a really good idea. Small incremental improvements meet the least amount of resistance and is much easier way to gain acceptance. But can you afford to wait?
According to George Leonard, author of the Mastery it is a universal experience.
Every one of us resists significant change, no matter whether it’s for the worst or for the better. Our body, brain, and behavior have ability and tendency to stay the same within rather narrow limits.
It is safe to assume that resistance to change even the beginning of a change for the better is interpreted as a threat. No need to count the ways that organizations and cultures resist change and backslide when change does occur. Just let it be said that the resistance here is proportionate to the size and speed of the change, not to whether the change is a favorable or unfavorable one.
Leonard also outlined five guidelines, which I have taken the liberty of changing slightly to fit this discussion:
- Expect resistance and backlash: Realize that when the alarm bell starts ringing it doesn’t necessarily mean you’ve made a bad decision on the journey for continues improvement. In fact you might take these signals as an indication that your life is deftly changing just what you wanted. Of course it might be that you have started something that’s not right for you: only you can decide. But in any case don’t panic and give up at the first out of trouble. Expect resistance from coworkers and managers. You might figure that they should be overjoyed if things have improved but bear in mind that an entire system has to change when any part changes. So don’t be surprised if some of the people start covertly or overtly undermining your self-improvement.
- Be willing to negotiate with your resistance to change: So what should you do when you run into resistance is don’t back off and don’t bully your way through. Negotiation is a ticket to successful long-term change in everything and in particular to transforming your organization. The change oriented manager keeps his or her eyes and ears open for signs of the dissatisfaction, then plays the edge of discontent, the inevitable escort a transformation. The fine art of playing the edge in this case involves a willingness to take one step back for every two forward, sometimes vice versa. It also demands and termination to keep pushing, but not without awareness. Simply turn off your awareness to the warnings deprives you of guidance and risk damaging the system. Simply pushing her way through despite the warning signals increase the chances for backsliding.
- Develop a support system:. You can do it alone but it helps a great deal to have other people with whom you can share the joys and perils of the change are making. The best support system would involve people gone through or are going through a similar process, people who can tell their own story of change and listen to yours, people who breach you up when you start to backslide and encourage you when you don’t.
- Follow regular practice: People embarking on a any type of change can gain stability and comfort to practicing some worthwhile activity on a more or less regular basis not so much for the sake of achieving an external goal as simply for its own sake. A traveler in the path of continuous improvement is again fortunate for practice in this sense is the foundation of the path itself. If you already have particular practices in place use them as the method for introducing change. Provide a stable base during the instability of change can significantly help the transition.
- Dedicate yourself to lifelong learning: To learn is to change. Education and training plays a pivotal role in any transformation process. Don’t try to institute a continuous program without the learning. I think what made Six Sigma so successful and sustainable at places like GE, Motorola and Xerox is the training programs they instituted. The levels of knowledge created by the color of belts may be chastised by many but I thought it was a great internal mechanism provided by those organizations. On a broader perspective, the book On the Mend was about change and the authors illustrated the 5 Stages of Change with a diagram that bears many similarities to the outline by George Leonard.
I am amazed how closely the description of change that Dr. Toussaint outlines in On the Mend and in our podcast resembles the path that Leonard describes in Mastery. A good example is the partnership between the Lean Enterprise Institute (LEI) and the ThedaCare Center for Healthcare Value (TCHV). It brings together two of the world’s leaders in “lean thinking,” with a combined 20 years of experience in lean implementation and education. Working in partnership allows LEI and the TCHV to leverage Leonard’s 5 step process for overcoming the resistance of change.
If you would like to learn more, join John Toussaint, MD, and Roger Gerard, PhD, on Monday, September 13, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. (Eastern) for a free webinar on how to engage people and put culture change at the center of your lean management conversion.
Related Posts:
Story of Going Lean in Healthcare: On the Mend
Lean Enterprise and Thedacare team together to hold Strategy Deployment Virtual Event
If the facts don’t fit the theory, change the facts!
Key Marketing Concepts from the Korean War
Transforming Healthcare thru Lean
Posted by: | CommentsJohn Toussaint, M.D., CEO of the ThedaCare Center for Healthcare Value was my Podcast guest this week. From 2000 to 2008, Dr. Toussaint served as president and chief executive officer of ThedaCare, Inc., a community-owned, four-hospital health system including twenty-one physician clinics, as well as home health capabilities, senior care facilities, hospice care, and behavioral health. ThedaCare is the largest employer in Northeast Wisconsin with nearly 5,400 employees, serving an eight-county region.
During his tenure as president and CEO of ThedaCare, Dr. Toussaint introduced the ThedaCare Improvement System (TIS), which is derived from the Toyota Production System. This model of continuous improvement helped save millions of dollars in healthcare costs by reducing patient errors, improving outcomes and delivering better quality care at a higher value.
Dr. Toussaint’s new book, On the Mend: Revolutionizing Healthcare to Save Lives and Transform the Industry, co-authored with Roger A. Gerard, PhD. describes the triumphs and stumbles of a seven-year journey to lean healthcare, an effort that continues today. In the podcast, we discussed the “How to” of these achievements. I believe that any Continuous Improvement participant can benefit from reading this book. I have read it twice!
About Healthcare Value Leaders: The partnership between the Lean Enterprise Institute (LEI) and the ThedaCare Center for Healthcare Value (TCHV) brings together two of the world’s leaders in “lean thinking,” with a combined 20 years of experience in lean implementation and education. Working in partnership allows LEI and the TCHV to leverage their unique perspectives and not-for-profit missions to accomplish a shared goal of fundamentally improving healthcare delivery through lean thinking.
Join John Toussaint, MD, and Roger Gerard, PhD, on Monday, September 13, 2010, at 2:00 p.m. (Eastern) for a free webinar on how to engage people and put culture change at the center of your lean management conversion.
Related Posts:
Story of Going Lean in Healthcare: On the Mend
Lean Enterprise and Thedacare team together to hold Strategy Deployment Virtual Event
Mark Graban of the Lean Blog discusses Lean Healthcare
Can you Master Continuous Improvement?
Posted by: | CommentsWhat is Mastery?
- Comprehensive knowledge or skill in a subject or accomplishment.
- The action or process of mastering a subject or accomplishment
Mastery, why don’t we spend more time learning about it? I have always been convinces that it is not how many tools you have in your bag but how many tools you use well. The old saying is that if all you have is a hammer then everything looks like a nail is not always a bad thing. If you are a wizard with a hammer, it may be amazing how creative you may be in fixing problems outside of a nail because of your ability to adapt and modify. In the long run you may have arrived at a solution while others are still contemplating HOW!
Michael Gerber states in the E-Myth Mastery: The Seven Essential Disciplines for Building a World Class Company
that “knowing how to do the work of a business has nothing to do with building a business that works”; that entrepreneurs learn their skills through practice, practice, practice; and that anyone willing to adopt that same kind of discipline can be successful too.
Malcolm Gladwell in Outliers: The Story of Success
discusses the need to have 10,000 hours of practice before they become a master of their art, profession, etc. That amounts to 3 hours a day for 10 years.
When companies are looking at implementing Continuous Improvement efforts such as Lean or Six Sigma or even a Marketing System are they really considering the commitment that they are making. In today’s world most improvement efforts have to show short term results, less than a year to be continued. Management is usually blamed for lack of commitment for most failures. I believe that the expectations of a quick fix may be the number reason for failure. Let’s face it, is anyone telling a company that it will take 10 years to master Lean or Six Sigma? You can probably accelerate this process by proper coaching or having you own Sensei, we know they have 10,000 hours and it is the best way to improve your chances. You also have to have talent and experience on your side. However, it does take a little luck to be successful as described in this light-hearted look at Talent. Now, there are a couple of fowl words in the video, so you have been forewarned.
An old book, Mastery: The Keys to Success and Long-Term Fulfillment ( a list in the Amazon review section of questions is outstanding) describes 5 keys to long-term success and fulfillment as:
- Instruction
- Practice
- Surrender
- Intentionality
- The Edge – Push the envelop
Michael Gerber made a point in his book cited above that left an ever lasting impression on me. Laying in bed one morning my wife asked me what I was thinking about it and I replied: Gerber made this comment if I really did not feel like going to work today, do you think anyone else does ( meaning my employees). That morning I decided to sell that business and pursue what I enjoy, what I really love because if you do not, seldom will you ever have the patience to develop those skills.
As an organization, are you willing to take a path of continuous improvement? Can you develop the mastery of your profession or product without it?
Related Posts:
Has Technology Killed Time?
Who is your Lean Rock star?
Marketing your Black Belt






